On Jan 04 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > [ let's add a few people ] > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Grant Grundler <grundler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm researching MODULE_LICENSE uses/declarations and AFAICT > >> DRIVER_LICENSE is only obfuscating the programatically declared > >> license. e.g.: > >> > >> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > >> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > >> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > >> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > >> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > >> drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > >> drivers/hid/wacom.h:#define DRIVER_LICENSE "GPL" > >> drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c:MODULE_LICENSE(DRIVER_LICENSE); > >> > >> Any objection to removing those uses in drivers/hid? > > > > Sounds good to me. No objections on my side. Cheers, Benjamin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
