Re: [PATCH v3] HID: wacom: generic: add 5 tablet touch keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dmitry,

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 22 2016 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:30:13AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Ping Cheng wrote:
>> >
>> > > Wacom Cintiq Pro [1] is a series of display tablets. They support
>> > > 5 touch keys on the tablet. Those keys represent specific functions.
>> > > They turn display off; bring up OSD; bring up On Screen Keyboard;
>> > > bring up desktop control panel; and turn touch on/off.
>> > >
>> > > The most left touch key, that turns display on/off, is controlled by
>> > > firmware. When the display is on, the mode is set. Otherwise, the
>> > > mode is off. So, it works like a switch. That's why we introduced a
>> > > new switch: SW_INDIRECT. The switch defauts to INDIRECT instead of DIRECT
>> > > was a request from useland, more specifically Gnome, developers.
>> > >
>> > > Other four touch keys are true software keys. We use the existing
>> > > KEY_BUTTONCONFIG and KEY_CONTROLPANEL for OSD and control panel. But,
>> > > we have to request two new keys: KEY_ONSCREEN_KEYBOARD and KEY_MUTE_DEVICE
>> > > since none of the existing keys support those two actions.
>> > >
>> > > [1] http://www.wacom.com/en-us/products/pen-displays/wacom-cintiq-pro
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Ping Cheng <ping.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > ---
>> > > v3: Since no one has followed up with v2, let's add some more comments for
>> > > SW_INDIRECT so we keep the offlist decision public ;).
>> >
>> > [ ... snip ... ]
>> >
>> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
>> > > index d6d071f..32ef894 100644
>> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
>> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
>> > > @@ -641,6 +641,9 @@
>> > >   * e.g. teletext or data broadcast application (MHEG, MHP, HbbTV, etc.)
>> > >   */
>> > >  #define KEY_DATA                 0x275
>> > > +/* same as SW_MUTE_DEVICE but triggered by a key */
>> > > +#define KEY_MUTE_DEVICE          0x278
>> > > +#define KEY_ONSCREEN_KEYBOARD            0x279
>> > >
>> > >  #define BTN_TRIGGER_HAPPY                0x2c0
>> > >  #define BTN_TRIGGER_HAPPY1               0x2c0
>> > > @@ -781,7 +784,8 @@
>> > >  #define SW_LINEIN_INSERT 0x0d  /* set = inserted */
>> > >  #define SW_MUTE_DEVICE           0x0e  /* set = device disabled */
>> > >  #define SW_PEN_INSERTED          0x0f  /* set = pen inserted */
>> > > -#define SW_MAX                   0x0f
>> > > +#define SW_INDIRECT              0x10  /* set = not a direct input device */
>> > > +#define SW_MAX                   0x1f
>> >
>> > I'd like to have explicit Ack from Dmitry on these ... Dmitry?
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, but I think adding SW_INDIRECT is actually wrong.
>>
>> What Wacom folks seem to need is way to re-classfiy the device (i.e.
>> update its properties) and let userspace know somehow. We can't keep
>> adding SW_INDIRECT and SW_NOTPOINTER and SW_NOTBUTTONPAD and so forth.
>> We however have EV_SYN/SYN_CONFIG that we may use to let userspace know
>> that device configuration changed and that userspace needs to
>> interrogate the device again. We can emit this code both when we change
>> properties as well as when we change ABS limits and changing keymaps and
>> so forth.

By "to interrogate the device again",  do you mean once we report
EV_SYN/SYN_CONFIG, userspace needs to reinitialize the device?

If not, how do we tell userspace which feature/info has been changed?

>>
>> Benjamin, Peter, any opinion on the above?
>
> Oooh, so that's the purpose of this event :) (the documentation says
> "TBD"). I am fine with that. We would need to adapt the documentation in
> Documentation/input/event-codes.txt and make sure the handlers are
> properly adapted too (*maybe* add a SYN_DROP event to empty the queue of
> the events in userspace).

Can you update the "TBD" in Documentation/input/event-codes.txt so we
have an agreed description to follow?

Thanks,

Ping

> On the userspace tool, I guess there will be some tweaks to do in
> libevdev and libinput, but these are basically what would need to be
> done with the creation of the new switches.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I'll let the Wacom engineers work on the
> kernel code now :)
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>
>>
>> I'm OK with the other 2 new keycodes.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux