On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:06:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The ACPI-enabled platform may contain _DSD method to enable this driver using
> compatible string.
>
> Remove OF specifics to re-use existing code on ACPI-enabled platforms.
Is there an x86 box that uses this device?
Thanks.
>
> Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c
> index a8b0a2eec344..7fed92fb8cc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x-i2c.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id adxl34x_id[] = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, adxl34x_id);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id adxl34x_of_id[] = {
> /*
> * The ADXL346 is backward-compatible with the ADXL345. Differences are
> @@ -153,13 +152,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id adxl34x_of_id[] = {
> };
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adxl34x_of_id);
> -#endif
>
> static struct i2c_driver adxl34x_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "adxl34x",
> .pm = &adxl34x_i2c_pm,
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(adxl34x_of_id),
> + .of_match_table = adxl34x_of_id,
> },
> .probe = adxl34x_i2c_probe,
> .remove = adxl34x_i2c_remove,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
