On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 21:33 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > As per the comment here, it seems that you applied v4 version of > patch. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9428715/ > > > > But when I look at the upstream kernel, the very first version of > the > > patch was applied, which was wrong. > > > > Basically the change should be in sensor_hub_get_feature() not in > > sensor_hub_set_feature(). > > Otherwise it breaks sensor functionality. > > > > How should we handle this? > > Hi Srinivas, > > my whole queue is now merged by Linus, so any fixups should be > submitted > as standalone patches on top of current Linus' tree; I'll push the > fix to > Linus then for 4.10 still. > > Ideally we also put proper "Fixes:" tag, so that it gets picked up > by > 4.9-stable once/if there is one. > > Thanks, and sorry for my brainfart; I'll check my archives to see > what > went wrong. No problem at all. Thanks, Srinivas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
