Hi Takashi, On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:55:07AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:19:46 +0100, > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:29:23 +0100, > > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > Hi Takashi, > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:56:36PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > > > > I've been testing a small machine with Intel Cherry Trail chipset, and > > > > noticed that the kernel spews errors always like: > > > > > > > > i8042: PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly. > > > > i8042: Can't read CTR while initializing i8042 > > > > i8042: probe of i8042 failed with error -5 > > > > > > > > Especially the second one ("Can't read CTR...") is annoying since it's > > > > in KERN_ERR level and thus appears even booted with quiet boot > > > > option. Actually this is the only error message appearing at boot, so > > > > I'd love to get rid of it. > > > > > > > > What is the preferred way to reduce this? For example, is a patch > > > > like below OK to simply change the log level and the error code? > > > > > > No, because if controller is actually present this is a hard failure and > > > we should be reporting it, not suppressing it. > > > > > > The issue is that we did not believe PNP data and in this case we should > > > have. Unfortunately in old days there was a lot of crap in PNP/ACPI > > > tables, but it could be better now. We can try, in addition to PNP > > > matching, checking 8042 flag in "Fixed ACPI Description Table Boot > > > Architecture Flags" in FADT and if it also shows there is no 8042 then > > > bail. > > > > That sounds promising. Indeed FACL.dsl shows like: > > > > [000h 0000 4] Signature : "FACP" [Fixed ACPI Description Table (FADT)] > > [004h 0004 4] Table Length : 0000010C > > .... > > Legacy Devices Supported (V2) : 0 > > 8042 Present on ports 60/64 (V2) : 0 > > > > If a test patch gets ready, let me know, I'll give it a try. > > FYI, a hack like below seems working. > > > Takashi > > --- > diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > index 073246c7d163..ed6ab702e4b7 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > +++ b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > #include <asm/x86_init.h> > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > #endif > > /* > @@ -1055,6 +1056,13 @@ static int __init i8042_pnp_init(void) > #if defined(__ia64__) > return -ENODEV; > #else > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= 3 && > + !(acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_8042)) { > + pr_info("PNP: No PS/2 controller found and disabled in ACPI\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > +#endif > pr_info("PNP: No PS/2 controller found. Probing ports directly.\n"); > return 0; > #endif I'm not an expert in any subsystem but, maybe this "hack" could be added to default_i8042_detect in arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c? Currently it is enabled by default, but different Intel platform like ce4100 and intel-mid disables it explicit. I mentioned "hack" because following osdev.org[1] using ACPI is the correct way to detect if i8042 exists. Pardon me if this not applies in this situation, or if I missed something. [1] http://wiki.osdev.org/%228042%22_PS/2_Controller#Step_2:_Determine_if_the_PS.2F2_Controller_Exists Thanks, > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html