Dear Mr. Daniel Stone, Greetings! I am Aniroop Mathur from Samsung R&D Institute, India. I have submitted one patch as below for review to Linux Open Source. The problem is that we do not have the hardware available with us to test it and we would like to test it before actually applying it. Here currently, we are using msleep(1) which is worse as it sleeps for minimum two jiffies i.e 20 ms on a system with HZ = 100. As you are the author of this driver, I am contacting you to request you provide your feedback upon this patch. Also if you have the hardware available, could you please help to test this patch on your hardware? or could you provide contact points of individuals who could support to test it? Thank you! BR, Aniroop Mathur On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and will often sleep longer. > (~20 ms actual sleep for any value given in the 1~20ms range) > This is not the desired behaviour for many cases like device resume time, > device suspend time, device enable time, retry logic, etc. > Thus, change msleep to usleep_range for precise wakeups. > > Signed-off-by: Aniroop Mathur <a.mathur@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/input/keyboard/lm8323.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/lm8323.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/lm8323.c > index 21bea52..14679e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/lm8323.c > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/lm8323.c > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int lm8323_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > break; > } > > - msleep(1); > + usleep_range(1000, 1100); > } > > lm8323_configure(lm); > -- > 2.6.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
