On Sunday 13 November 2016 07:43:35 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Saturday 12 November 2016 02:06:40 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 02:03:42AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> > On Saturday 12 November 2016 01:56:21 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > >> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:59:09PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > >> > > > On Thursday 10 November 2016 17:44:43 Paul Donohue wrote: > >> > > > > This series includes a bug fix and assorted cleanup for > >> > > > > the Alps SS5 (SS4 v2) code. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Changes in v5: > >> > > > > * Moved TrackStick decoding logic to > >> > > > > alps_process_packet_ss4_v2() to > >> > > > > > >> > > > > make the code more consistent with other protocol > >> > > > > versions (Suggested by Pali Rohár > >> > > > > <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Changes in v4: > >> > > > > * Fixed patch formatting issues > >> > > > > * Correct casting issues in macros added in v3 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Changes in v3: > >> > > > > * Added additional code cleanup to make the code easier to > >> > > > > understand > >> > > > > > >> > > > > (Suggested by Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Changes in v2: > >> > > > > * For consistency with other Alps functions, check packet > >> > > > > bytes for > >> > > > > > >> > > > > packet type rather than adding a flag to alps_fields for > >> > > > > packet > >> > > > > > >> > > > > type. (Suggested by Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Paul Donohue (3): > >> > > > > Input: ALPS - Fix TrackStick support for SS5 hardware > >> > > > > Input: ALPS - Clean up TrackStick handling for SS5 > >> > > > > hardware Input: ALPS - Clean up code for SS5 hardware > >> > > > > > >> > > > > drivers/input/mouse/alps.c | 59 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > >> > > > > drivers/input/mouse/alps.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > >> > > > > >> > > > Whole patch series looks fine. > >> > > > You can add my Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár > >> > > > <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > >> > > FYI: I do not see a dingle email from Paul, only your replies. > >> > > >> > Patches were sent to linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ML. Maybe some > >> > spam filter ate emails? Btw I added you to receivers of my last > >> > sent email. > >> > >> Yes, I looked there as well and did not see anything but you > >> replies. > >> > >> Thanks. > > > > Do you need to resend patches? Or have you already found them? > > Hmm, was the latest v5? I see > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9421473/ Yes, v5 is the last. > It looks like Paul is running his own mailserver on what looks like > Verizon IP pool, which in this day and age likely makes gmail drop > his mails. Hm... looks weird... because at least I received his emails on my gmail account... -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
