Hi Silvan, On Aug 21 2016 or thereabouts, Silvan Jegen wrote: > The "exist" field is only checked when "roccat_open" has already been > called or when we have made sure that the corresponding roccat_device is > not NULL. Since the value of the "open" field has been increased by the > "roccat_open" call, instead of checking "exist" we can just check if > "open" is equal to zero to the same effect and remove the "exist" field > as well as the code that touches it. > > > Signed-off-by: Silvan Jegen <s.jegen@xxxxxxxxx> Well, if you look at the history, since v4.4 this driver is deprecated (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7422131/), so I am not so sure you should put a lot of effort in cleaning this up. > > --- > I have tested this patch with the only Roccat hardware I own, a Roccat > Kone Pure. Testing the patch with several pieces of Roccat hardware > connected at the same time would be desirable. > > > drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c | 20 +++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c > index 76d06cf..7552a1e 100644 > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat.c > @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ struct roccat_device { > unsigned int minor; > int report_size; > int open; > - int exist; > wait_queue_head_t wait; > struct device *dev; > struct hid_device *hid; > @@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ static ssize_t roccat_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, > retval = -ERESTARTSYS; > break; > } > - if (!device->exist) { > + if (device->open == 0) { It feels weird to check for the device we are currently reading to be opened (by the caller?). I think this changes a little bit the way the flag was designed for. This flag is controlled when the physical HW is removed/added. But when the physical HW is removed, you might have some readers to the special chardev. And so it needs to have a way to stop the readers that are waiting for incoming data (read or poll). Stefan might have a deeper look and ACK/NACK it, but to me, the patch looks wrong :/ Cheers, Benjamin > retval = -EIO; > break; > } > @@ -143,7 +142,7 @@ static unsigned int roccat_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) > poll_wait(file, &reader->device->wait, wait); > if (reader->cbuf_start != reader->device->cbuf_end) > return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM; > - if (!reader->device->exist) > + if (reader->device->open == 0) > return POLLERR | POLLHUP; > return 0; > } > @@ -224,13 +223,11 @@ static int roccat_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > kfree(reader); > > if (!--device->open) { > - /* removing last reader */ > - if (device->exist) { > - hid_hw_power(device->hid, PM_HINT_NORMAL); > - hid_hw_close(device->hid); > - } else { > - kfree(device); > - } > + /* we have removed the last reader */ > + kfree(device); > + } else { > + hid_hw_power(device->hid, PM_HINT_NORMAL); > + hid_hw_close(device->hid); > } > > mutex_unlock(&devices_lock); > @@ -340,7 +337,6 @@ int roccat_connect(struct class *klass, struct hid_device *hid, int report_size) > mutex_init(&device->cbuf_lock); > device->minor = minor; > device->hid = hid; > - device->exist = 1; > device->cbuf_end = 0; > device->report_size = report_size; > > @@ -359,8 +355,6 @@ void roccat_disconnect(int minor) > device = devices[minor]; > mutex_unlock(&devices_lock); > > - device->exist = 0; /* TODO exist maybe not needed */ > - > device_destroy(device->dev->class, MKDEV(roccat_major, minor)); > > mutex_lock(&devices_lock); > -- > 2.9.3 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
