On 08/03/2016 05:26 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:00:44PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> The Pulse-Eight USB CEC adapter is a usb device that shows up as a ttyACM0 device. >> It requires that you run inputattach in order to communicate with it via serio. >> >> This all works well, but it would be nice to have a udev rule to automatically >> start inputattach. That too works OK, but the problem comes when the USB device >> is unplugged: the tty hangup is never handled by the serio framework so the >> inputattach utility never exits and you have to kill it manually. >> >> By adding this hangup callback the inputattach utility now properly exits as >> soon as the USB device is unplugged. >> >> The udev rule I used on my Debian sid system is: >> >> SUBSYSTEM=="tty", KERNEL=="ttyACM[0-9]*", ATTRS{idVendor}=="2548", ATTRS{idProduct}=="1002", ACTION=="add", TAG+="systemd", ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="pulse8-cec-inputattach@%k.service" >> >> And pulse8-cec-inputattach@%k.service is as follows: >> >> =============================================================== >> [Unit] >> Description=inputattach for pulse8-cec device on %I >> >> [Service] >> Type=simple >> ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/inputattach --pulse8-cec /dev/%I >> KillMode=process >> =============================================================== >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Change since the original RFC patch: don't call close() from the hangup() function, >> instead only set the DEAD flag in hangup() instead of in close(). >> --- >> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/serport.c b/drivers/input/serio/serport.c >> index 9c927d3..4045e95 100644 >> --- a/drivers/input/serio/serport.c >> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/serport.c >> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static void serport_serio_close(struct serio *serio) >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&serport->lock, flags); >> clear_bit(SERPORT_ACTIVE, &serport->flags); >> - set_bit(SERPORT_DEAD, &serport->flags); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&serport->lock, flags); >> >> wake_up_interruptible(&serport->wait); > > I think we should remove this line as well - the waiter is waiting on > SERPORT_DEAD bit, if we are not setting it we do not need to wake up the > waiter either. > > I can fix it up on my side. OK, I wasn't sure about that myself, thanks for looking into this and taking care of it. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html