I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c index 2c41107..08216fd 100644 --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ #define DRIVER_DESC "USB Touchscreen Driver" static bool swap_xy; -module_param(swap_xy, bool, 0644); +module_param(swap_xy, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(swap_xy, "If set X and Y axes are swapped."); static bool hwcalib_xy; -module_param(hwcalib_xy, bool, 0644); +module_param(hwcalib_xy, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(hwcalib_xy, "If set hw-calibrated X/Y are used if available"); /* device specifc data/functions */ -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
