On 07/28/2016 09:01 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Thu 28 Jul 11:33 PDT 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:55:11AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[..]
Do not quite like it... I'd rather asynchronous request give out a
firmware status pointer that could be used later on.
pcu->fw_st = request_firmware_async(IMS_PCU_FIRMWARE_NAME,
pcu,
ims_pcu_process_async_firmware);
if (IS_ERR(pcu->fw_st))
return PTR_ERR(pcu->fw_st);
....
fw_loading_wait(pcu->fw_st);
In the remoteproc case (patch 6) this would clean up the code, rather
than replacing the completion API 1 to 1. I like it!
IIRC most drivers do it the same way. So request_firmware_async() indeed
would be good thing to have. Let me try that.
Thanks for the excellent feedback.
cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
