On Wed 2016-07-20 02:06:17, Michael Welling wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:54:05AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > By same logic we shouldn't change from TSC200X back to TSC2005 because of > > > people's possibly new setup in the last 9 months. > > > > That's your, broken logic. > > > > TSC200X->TSC2005 needs to be fixed, because people seen the TSC2005 > > for past few years. > > > > TSC200X->TSC2004 is just introducing regression, because noone ever > > seen TSC2004, AFAICT. > > I am pretty sure no one cares. Escpecially me. Dunno. Lets do the right thing: TSC2005 for 2005, TSC200X for everyone else. Interface issues are tricky to handle once created, so its best to be careful. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
