On Friday, June 24, 2016 10:28:50 AM CEST Jiri Kosina wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > > Use IS_ENABLED() for checking USB_HIDDEV to make sure compilation works > for all possible config combinations. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/hiddev.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/hiddev.h b/include/linux/hiddev.h > index a5dd814..b6f48d6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/hiddev.h > +++ b/include/linux/hiddev.h > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct hid_usage; > struct hid_field; > struct hid_report; > > -#ifdef CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV) > int hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int force); > void hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *); > void hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field, > > CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV is a 'bool' option, so the two look completely equivalent. If we wanted to make USB_HIDDEV a loadable module by itself, we'd also need to export those functions and change both the Kconfig and Makefile files to ensure that you can't have USB_HIDDEV=m in combination with USB_HID=y. What problem are you trying to fix specifically? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
