Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
--->8---
virtual patch
@@
struct pwm_device *p;
expression e;
@@
(
-(p)->polarity = e;
+pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
|
-(p)->polarity
+pwm_get_polarity((p))
|
-(p)->period = e;
+pwm_set_period((p), e);
|
-(p)->period
+pwm_get_period((p))
|
-(p)->duty_cycle = e;
+pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
|
-(p)->duty_cycle
+pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
)
--->8---
---
drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c b/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
index 328fcfc..b6306a2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-pwm.c
@@ -71,22 +71,23 @@ static int clk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(pwm))
return PTR_ERR(pwm);
- if (!pwm->period) {
+ if (!pwm_get_period((pwm))) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid PWM period\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_pwm->fixed_rate))
- clk_pwm->fixed_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / pwm->period;
+ clk_pwm->fixed_rate = NSEC_PER_SEC / pwm_get_period((pwm));
- if (pwm->period != NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_pwm->fixed_rate &&
- pwm->period != DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_pwm->fixed_rate)) {
+ if (pwm_get_period((pwm)) != NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_pwm->fixed_rate &&
+ pwm_get_period((pwm)) != DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_pwm->fixed_rate)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
"clock-frequency does not match PWM period\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = pwm_config(pwm, (pwm->period + 1) >> 1, pwm->period);
+ ret = pwm_config(pwm, (pwm_get_period((pwm)) + 1) >> 1,
+ pwm_get_period((pwm)));
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
