Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix y2038 problem in input_event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wen,

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:35:36PM +0800, WEN Pingbo wrote:
> Before this, I have discussed this problem with Arnd. And Arnd have
> an idea that by converting timeval to long / long in input_event, so that
> input_event structure size will be unchanged, and timeval structure will
> removed entirely. But we also need to avoid using CLOCK_REALTIME in
> userland, to keep the new input_event structure y2038 safe.
> 
> The input_event will only support monotonic time in Arnd's idea. And
> we still need to add wall time support for old 32-bit binary. 
> 
> Those patches try to keep original input capacity, and resolve y2038
> problem in input_event radically.
> 
> struct input_event is only used between kernel and userspace
> communication (except uinput). So that we can replace input_event
> with input_event64 in kernel entirely, and add a conversion in
> input_event_from/to_user() to keep compatible with old 32-bits binary.
> 
> userland can switch to input_event64, which is y2038 safe, via ioctl.

If we are forcing userspace to change the protocol I'd rather explore
whether we need to transmit the timestamp in each and every event. I
would much rather drop it and instead introduce new event code for
timestamp (we already have MSC_TIMESTAMP for hardware-generated
timestamps, maybe we can introduce new ones for kernel-generated
timestamps).

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux