2015-10-16 16:58 GMT+08:00 Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:27:00AM -0400, Vincent Wan wrote: >> Detecting platform supports i8042 or not, AMD resorted to >> BIOS's FADT i8042 flag. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Wan <Vincent.Wan@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> /* >> @@ -1047,6 +1048,11 @@ static int __init i8042_platform_init(void) >> /* Just return if pre-detection shows no i8042 controller exist */ >> if (!x86_platform.i8042_detect()) >> return -ENODEV; >> + >> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) { > > Why the vendor check if you're accessing a bit defined in the ACPI spec? >From intel's 'x86_platform.i8042_detect' implementation, I doubt if their BIOS is providing this i8024 flag. So I have to implement my codes carefully. > >> + if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_8042)) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- --- Vincent Wan(Zongshun) www.mcuos.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html