On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:04:15PM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote: > > > On 05/08/15 01:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Since the T9 code is for compatibility with old Pixel only I do not think > > we should be adding it to device tree binding, at least not at the > > moment. I cut the device tree parsing out and default to deep sleep on > > DT-based systems. Thanks. > > That sounds fair enough. We do need something like this eventually to > support different suspend implementations (eg powering down via regulators). That does not really need config I think: in ChromeOS tree wee key the behavior off presence of reset GPIO line: if it sis there (definied via ACPI, devicetree or board lookup code) then we assume we need to control the power up sequence with regulators, otherwise we put the controller into deep sleep mode. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
