On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:07:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > During unbinding the driver was dereferencing a pointer to memory
> > already freed by power_supply_unregister().
> >
> > Driver was freeing its internal description of battery through pointers
> > stored in power_supply structure. However, because the core owns the
> > power supply instance, after calling power_supply_unregister() the
> > driver cannot access these members.
> >
> > Fix this by using resource-managed allocations so internal data will be
> > freed by pointers stored in resource-managed core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 297d716f6260 ("power_supply: Change ownership from driver to core")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied to for-4.2/upstream-fixes, thanks.
Wait, what guarantees do we have that this is only called in probe()
paths? Don't we allow hid_hw_start() be deferred to open() calls?
In general we need to be careful with devm* conversions in core code.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
