Hi, while debugging a problem of X and gdm with the old systemd-210, we encountered a sudden death of systemd-logind, and this turned out to be an unexpected errno from close(). The close() call for input devices returns ENODEV error. The logind in systemd-210 treats this error code as fatal, triggers assert() and eventually kills itself. The details are found in an openSUSE bugzilla thread: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939571 This seems coming from evdev_flush(). As there is no fd leak, it's no big problem per se. But, now the question is whether returning such an error code is correct behavior at all. At least, it doesn't seem defined in POSIX: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/close.html I myself have no strong opinion here, so would like just to ask others suggestions / comments. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
