On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 09:59 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:46:48AM -0400, cpaul@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +static int i8042_kbd_bind_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > + unsigned long action, void
> > *data)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = data;
> > + struct serio *serio = to_serio_port(dev);
> > + struct i8042_port *port = serio->port_data;
> > +
> > + if (serio != i8042_ports[I8042_KBD_PORT_NO].serio)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + switch (action) {
> > + case BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER:
> > + port->driver_bound = true;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
>
> I think it should be BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER so that we see the KBD
> data as it goes through driver cleanup. Yell if you disagree, or I'll
> change it locally.
Sounds good to me
Cheers,
Stephen Chandler Paul
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
