Re: [PATCH v2] Input: pmic8xxx-pwrkey - Support shutdown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2015 05:25 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

@@ -76,6 +131,220 @@ static int __maybe_unused pmic8xxx_pwrkey_resume(struct device *dev)
  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pm8xxx_pwr_key_pm_ops,
  		pmic8xxx_pwrkey_suspend, pmic8xxx_pwrkey_resume);
+static void pmic8xxx_pwrkey_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *pwrkey = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	int ret;
+	u8 mask, val;
+	bool reset = system_state == SYSTEM_RESTART;
+
+	if (pwrkey->shutdown_fn) {
+		ret = pwrkey->shutdown_fn(pwrkey, reset);
+		if (ret)
+			return;
Can we call this variable "error" please?

Ok.


+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Select action to perform (reset or shutdown) when PS_HOLD goes low.
+	 * Also ensure that KPD, CBL0, and CBL1 pull ups are enabled and that
+	 * USB charging is enabled.
+	 */
+	mask = PON_CNTL_1_PULL_UP_EN | PON_CNTL_1_USB_PWR_EN;
+	mask |= PON_CNTL_1_WD_EN_RESET;
+	val = mask;
+	if (!reset)
+		val &= ~PON_CNTL_1_WD_EN_RESET;
+
+	regmap_update_bits(pwrkey->regmap, PON_CNTL_1, mask, val);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Set an SMPS regulator to be disabled in its CTRL register, but enabled
+ * in the master enable register.  Also set it's pull down enable bit.
+ * Take care to make sure that the output voltage doesn't change if switching
+ * from advanced mode to legacy mode.
+ */
+static int pm8058_disable_smps_locally_set_pull_down(struct regmap *regmap,
+	u16 ctrl_addr, u16 test2_addr, u16 master_enable_addr,
+	u8 master_enable_bit)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
Why does it need to be initialized? And "error" too please.

Doesn't need to be.


+
+	/* Enable LDO in master control register. */
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, master_enable_addr,
+			master_enable_bit, master_enable_bit);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Disable LDO in CTRL register and set pull down */
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, ctrl_addr,
+		PM8058_REGULATOR_ENABLE_MASK | PM8058_REGULATOR_PULL_DOWN_MASK,
+		PM8058_REGULATOR_DISABLE | PM8058_REGULATOR_PULL_DOWN_EN);
+}
+
+static int pm8058_pwrkey_shutdown(struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *pwrkey, bool reset)
+{
+	int ret;
And here.

Ok.


+	struct regmap *regmap = pwrkey->regmap;
+	u8 mask, val;
+
+	/* When shutting down, enable active pulldowns on important rails. */
+	if (!reset) {
+		/* Disable SMPS's 0,1,3 locally and set pulldown enable bits. */
+		pm8058_disable_smps_locally_set_pull_down(regmap,
+			PM8058_S0_CTRL, PM8058_S0_TEST2,
+			REG_PM8058_VREG_EN_MSM, BIT(7));
+		pm8058_disable_smps_locally_set_pull_down(regmap,
+			PM8058_S1_CTRL, PM8058_S1_TEST2,
+			REG_PM8058_VREG_EN_MSM, BIT(6));
+		pm8058_disable_smps_locally_set_pull_down(regmap,
+			PM8058_S3_CTRL, PM8058_S3_TEST2,
+			REG_PM8058_VREG_EN_GRP_5_4, BIT(7) | BIT(4));
+		/* Disable LDO 21 locally and set pulldown enable bit. */
+		pm8058_disable_ldo_locally_set_pull_down(regmap,
+			PM8058_L21_CTRL, REG_PM8058_VREG_EN_GRP_5_4,
+			BIT(1));
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Fix-up: Set regulator LDO22 to 1.225 V in high power mode. Leave its
+	 * pull-down state intact. This ensures a safe shutdown.
+	 */
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, PM8058_L22_CTRL, 0xbf, 0x93);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Enable SMPL if resetting is desired */
+	mask = SLEEP_CTRL_SMPL_EN_RESET;
+	val = 0;
+	if (reset)
+		val = mask;
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, PM8058_SLEEP_CTRL, mask, val);
+
Stray empty line.

Ok.


+}
+
+static int pm8921_pwrkey_shutdown(struct pmic8xxx_pwrkey *pwrkey, bool reset)
+{
+	struct regmap *regmap = pwrkey->regmap;
+	u8 mask = SLEEP_CTRL_SMPL_EN_RESET;
+	u8 val = 0;
+
+	/* Enable SMPL if resetting is desired */
+	if (reset)
+		val = mask;
+	return regmap_update_bits(regmap, PM8921_SLEEP_CTRL, mask, val);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-pwrkey", .data = &pm8058_pwrkey_shutdown },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey", .data = &pm8921_pwrkey_shutdown },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table);
+
Can we please keep IDs and device table where it was, close to the
driver definition?

That would require forward declaring the array here. Is that desired? I moved it so that I could use it in the probe function.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux