On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:46:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/23/2015 05:06 PM, m.silentcreek@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >is it possible that this patch (and the parent commit "Input: sun4i-ts - allow controlling filter and sensitivity via DT") has quite an adversial effect on other boards than the ones tested?
> >
> >On my Lemaker Bananapi the temperature is now being reported as somwhere between -15°C to -10°C with the latest Kernel 4.1.0. These negative values are obviously way off. On Kernel 4.0.5 the temperature reading was usually around 40°C. While that might not have been accurate either, it was at least plausible.
>
> The temperature curve for the A20 SoC was not changed, if it did change then
> you're using an old dtb file with a new kernel, you must always update your
> dtb file together with the kernel.
Umm, we should keep compatibility with old DTS...
>
>
>
> >
> >Given that there is no Documentation and things seem quite board-specific, I really don't know how this could be improved, so I can merely report my observation.
> >
> >Kind regards,
> >
> >Timo
> >
> >
> >Am Montag, 9. März 2015 10:38:02 UTC+1 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> >>The commit titled:
> >>"touchscreen: sun4i-ts: A10 (sun4i) has a different temperature curve"
> >>contains a math error, the offset it uses is in degrees, but the actual code
> >>applies the offset before multiplying by stepsize :|
> >>
> >>Given that this is rather backwards (every math course ever thought applies
> >>the multiplication before the offset for linear functions), this commit
> >>fixes things by changing the code applying the offset to do the logical
> >>thing, adjusting the offset for the other models accordingly.
> >>
> >>This has been tested on an A10, A13, A20 and A31 to make sure everything really
> >>is correct now.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>Note if possible this commit should be squashed into the original
> >>"touchscreen: sun4i-ts: A10 (sun4i) has a different temperature curve"
> >>commit as a fixup.
> >>---
> >> drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
> >>index 66ccd5a..178d2ef 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sun4i-ts.c
> >>@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int sun4i_get_temp(const struct sun4i_ts_data *ts, long *temp)
> >> if (ts->temp_data == -1)
> >> return -EAGAIN;
> >>
> >>- *temp = (ts->temp_data - ts->temp_offset) * ts->temp_step;
> >>+ *temp = ts->temp_data * ts->temp_step - ts->temp_offset;
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>@@ -255,17 +255,17 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> ts->ignore_fifo_data = true;
> >> ts->temp_data = -1;
> >> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ts")) {
> >>- /* Allwinner SDK has temperature = -271 + (value / 6) (C) */
> >>- ts->temp_offset = 1626;
> >>+ /* Allwinner SDK has temperature (C) = (value / 6) - 271 */
> >>+ ts->temp_offset = 271000;
> >> ts->temp_step = 167;
> >> } else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ts")) {
> >> /*
> >> * The A10 temperature sensor has quite a wide spread, these
> >> * parameters are based on the averaging of the calibration
> >> * results of 4 completely different boards, with a spread of
> >>- * temp_step from 96 - 170 and temp_offset from 1758 - 3310.
> >>+ * temp_step from 0.096 - 0.170 and temp_offset from 176 - 331.
> >> */
> >>- ts->temp_offset = 2570;
> >>+ ts->temp_offset = 257000;
> >> ts->temp_step = 133;
> >> } else {
> >> /*
> >>@@ -273,13 +273,13 @@ static int sun4i_ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> * the temperature. The formula used here is from the AXP209,
> >> * which is designed by X-Powers, an affiliate of Allwinner:
> >> *
> >>- * temperature = -144.7 + (value * 0.1)
> >>+ * temperature (C) = (value * 0.1) - 144.7
> >> *
> >> * Allwinner does not have any documentation whatsoever for
> >> * this hardware. Moreover, it is claimed that the sensor
> >> * is inaccurate and cannot work properly.
> >> */
> >>- ts->temp_offset = 1447;
> >>+ ts->temp_offset = 144700;
> >> ts->temp_step = 100;
> >> }
> >>
> >>--
> >>2.3.1
> >
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
