On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 10:17:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 09:49 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi Irina, > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:47:37PM +0300, Irina Tirdea wrote: > > > Fix alignment to match open parenthesis detected by > > > running checkpatch.pl --strict. > > > > Mixed bag of changes here, but that's checkpatch for you. > > Yup, > > checkpatch output is definitely a mix of automated > semi-competence and brain-deadness. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c > [] > > > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int goodix_ts_read_input_report(struct goodix_ts_data *ts, u8 *data) > > > data += 1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE; > > > error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client, > > > GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR + > > > - 1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE, > > > + 1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE, > > > > Bad - makes 1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE look like extra argument, not > > continuation of expression. > > <shrug> There's no great way to do this. > > Parentheses around the longer expression work. > > error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client, > (GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR + > 1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE), > > Exceeding 80 columns may be better. > Leaving it alone would be OK too. > > Maybe starting with 1 to be more similar > to the below would be better. > > > > @@ -157,7 +157,8 @@ static void goodix_process_events(struct goodix_ts_data *ts) > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < touch_num; i++) > > > goodix_ts_report_touch(ts, > > > - &point_data[1 + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE * i]); > > > + &point_data[1 + > > > + GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE * i]); > > > > No, this is plain ugly. > > Sometimes it's better to exceed 80 columns or > maybe use temporaries. Something like: Or not aligning the arguments (when it makes sense). Thankfully we are not using FORTRAN, COBOL or even Python here. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
