Re: [PATCH RESEND] hid:Change vendor id for USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 to correct id in hid-ids.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 May 2015, nick wrote:

> That's a good question and we discussed with Alan about this. Basically 
> the only id that works on non JP models is the one he checked. 

And now you are removing it.

> Your right there may be two vendor ids for the product a.k.a maybe for 
> revisions however to my knowledge there have been no major revisions of 
> the Surface Pro Three. In addition what is the likely hood that a vendor 
> has two ids for the same area 

It's quite common to have multiple PIDs for devices with the same 
internals.

> in the world, as I can't think of one vendor that does this unless 
> differencing between two of the products is important a.k.a like MAC 
> addresses 

MAC address is about distinguishing individial device instances from each 
other. PIDs are something completely different.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux