[patch] HID: rmi: fix some harmless BIT() mistakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



These defines are used like this:

	if (!(test_bit(RMI_STARTED, &hdata->flags)))

So the intent was to use bits 0, 1 and 2 but because of the extra BIT()
shifts we're actually using 1, 2 and 4.  It's harmless because it's done
consistently but static checkers will complain.

Fixes: 9fb6bf02e3ad ('HID: rmi: introduce RMI driver for Synaptics touchpads')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
index 368ffdf..2f3e51d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
 #define RMI_SET_RMI_MODE_REPORT_ID	0x0f /* Feature Report */
 
 /* flags */
-#define RMI_READ_REQUEST_PENDING	BIT(0)
-#define RMI_READ_DATA_PENDING		BIT(1)
-#define RMI_STARTED			BIT(2)
+#define RMI_READ_REQUEST_PENDING	0
+#define RMI_READ_DATA_PENDING		1
+#define RMI_STARTED			2
 
 /* device flags */
 #define RMI_DEVICE			BIT(0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux