Hello, The Surface Pro 3 Type Cover that I have from US is 045e:07dc. At the time, there was no Surface 3 to distinguish from. I believe many others also have this code. Alan On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:22 AM, nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2015-05-11 04:44 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Fri, 8 May 2015, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > > >> This fixes the bug,https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97951 > >> related to incorrecting using 0x07dc for the vendor id for > >> USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 devices and instead changing in > >> to the correct vendor id of 0x07de. > > > > Adding Alan Wu, who originally submitted the USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 > > quirk. > > > >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h > >> index 41f167e..2e51947 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h > >> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h > >> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ > >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_SURFACE_PRO_2 0x0799 > >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TOUCH_COVER_2 0x07a7 > >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_2 0x07a9 > >> -#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 0x07dc > >> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3 0x07de > >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_TYPE_COVER_3_JP 0x07dd > > > > Why do you think we just don't need both of them (i.e. there are > > persumably two devices that need this patch). > > > Jiri, > This is because I assumed as he didn't state the JP hardware and therefore only > one was affected. However I will send in a v2 changing both hardware product's > vendor id. > Cheers, > Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
