On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10-03-15 07:17, Steven Noonan wrote: >> >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> I just got a ThinkPad X250 in today and have tried out your patches on >> 3.19.1. Before the patches, the top TrackPoint buttons weren't working >> at all, but the clickpad was working fine. For the most part, your >> patches fixed the TrackPoint. >> >> There's something weird going on though. If I control the mouse cursor >> with the trackpoint nub, it feels "slow". At first I though it was >> running the video mode at half the normal refresh rate, because the >> pointer was only moving at what felt like a 30Hz refresh rate. But >> then I tried the trackpad, and it behaves as expected (snappy and >> responsive). Note that this is a definite difference between the BDW >> generation and the HSW generation, as my HSW ThinkPad Yoga feels fine. >> >> Is there something in the driver that controls the TrackPoint nub's >> sampling rate? > > > Actually the trackpoint sensitivity is of (less sensitive) on the t440 / > x240 generation too. There it seems slower then with previous thinkpads > as well. I was hoping this would be fixed with the t450, but given that > they've recycled the keyboard it makes sense that it is not fixed. > > I still have writing a kernel patch for this on my todo list. In the > mean time you can change the sensitivity as documented here: > > http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_configure_the_TrackPoint#Sensitivity_.26_Speed Nice! Super useful. > I plan to write a kernel patch to set a different sensitivity by default > on these newer models to fix this ootb. If you can let me know what seems > to be a good sensitivity that would be useful. Original values: # head speed sensitivity ==> speed <== 97 ==> sensitivity <== 128 These are comfortable for me, but are a little bit faster than even the X230 TrackPoint was: # head speed sensitivity ==> speed <== 105 ==> sensitivity <== 160 These feel pretty close to the X230 behavior: # head speed sensitivity ==> speed <== 105 ==> sensitivity <== 140 > Regards, > > Hans > > > > >> >> - Steven >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Benjamin Tissoires >> <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09-03-15 07:46, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:58:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25-02-15 15:36, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Benjamin Tissoires >>>>>>> <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Benjamin Tissoires >>>>>>>> <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the second episode of the Lenovo 2015 party :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks to Andrew, we now have an idea within the driver of what are >>>>>>>>> the extra >>>>>>>>> buttons aimed for, and the patch series looks cleaner. >>>>>>>>> Many thanks for your help. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I marked only patches 1/7, 2/7 and 3/7 as stable because they are >>>>>>>>> really >>>>>>>>> stable fixes. Without the rest of the series, user-space can cope >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> kernel result, and so there is IMO no need to backport too many >>>>>>>>> patches in >>>>>>>>> stable. I bet distributions will cherry-pick the rest of the series >>>>>>>>> however. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> any chances we consider this for 3.20 (or whatever it will be >>>>>>>> numbered)? >>>>>>>> I'd really like to see this accepted upstream in one way or one >>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>> so we will prevent the mess we had to deal with last year. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hans, Dmitry, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> well, it's been 3 weeks since I received the loaner I have to support >>>>>>> these touchpads. I will have to return it next week or the week after >>>>>>> at most. That means that I will not be able to conduct more tests at >>>>>>> that point. >>>>>>> Can I ask you to please review the series? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, sorry I missed you did a v2 (I did review v1). >>>>>> >>>>>> Series looks good to me and is: >>>>>> >>>>>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I did a few edits of the patches in the 2 series so I created a >>>>> separate >>>>> branch "synaptics" based on 3.19. I'd appreciate if you could give it q >>>>> quick spin before I will send it for 4.0. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't have access to the hardware in question, but Benjamin does, so >>>> we'll have to wait (a bit) for him to wake up :) >>>> >>> >>> It took me a little bit of time to retrieve the laptop and get it tested. >>> So far, so good: >>> - t440s (2013) shows the correct behavior >>> - x1 carbon 3 has the buttons properly forwarded through the >>> trackstick interface and are reacting as expected. >>> >>> Thanks Dmitry! >>> >>> I've added Daniel to the thread and asked it this morning if he could >>> also give a try to the series. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Benjamin >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" >>> in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
