On Feb 03 2015 or thereabouts, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> > Slot 0 is released correclty, but when we look for Contact ID 2, the slot
> > 0 is then picked up again because it is marked as inactive (trackingID < 0).
> >
> > This is wrong, and we should not reuse a slot in the same frame.
> > The test should also check for input_mt_is_used().
>
> Good catch! However...
>
> > @@ -453,7 +456,7 @@ int input_mt_get_slot_by_key(struct input_dev *dev, int key)
> > return s - mt->slots;
> >
> > for (s = mt->slots; s != mt->slots + mt->num_slots; s++)
> > - if (!input_mt_is_active(s)) {
> > + if (!input_mt_is_active(s) && !input_mt_is_used(mt, s)) {
> > s->key = key;
> > return s - mt->slots;
> > }
> >
>
> Here, you are changing the preconditions of the function without explicit
> reference to all its users. For one, it is now assumed that input_mt_is_used()
> is up-to-date, which requires either input_mt_drop_unused() or
> input_mt_sync_frame(), which does not seem to be true for all users of
> input_mt_get_slot_by_key(). After a couple of iterations with
> input_mt_report_slot_state() in those drivers, input_mt_is_used() will be true
> for all slots, and the driver will stop working.
Hmm... You are right. Thanks for pointing this out. This is something I
should have definitively thought.
So, on the kernel tree, I have only 5 drivers matching
input_mt_get_slot_by_key:
$ grep -lIr input_mt_get_slot_by_key | grep -E "\.[ch]$"
drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
drivers/input/input-mt.c
drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c
include/linux/input/mt.h
On these five drivers, 4 are using properly input_mt_sync_frame, and
only one is not. This one is the Wacom one :)
For most of the touch devices (except those that are auto-detected and
handled), the code just calls input_mt_report_pointer_emulation()
instead of input_mt_sync_frame().
Changing the 5 calls in this driver and adding a requirement to call
input_mt_sync_frame() when using input_mt_get_slot_by_key() does not
seem terrible.
>
> How about defering the deassignments until the end of the loop instead? That
> would remove possible reuse.
>
I don't think this is feasible. There is no loop in the slot assignment
case. The state is stored by the input subsystem, and when we process
a touch, all the previous touches have already been processed and forwarded
to the user space.
We *could* defer the slot release before sending the EV_SYN event, but
that would force users to call input_mt_sync_frame() anyway to release
the slots. So we would get an even greater requirement, because now, all
users of the slotted protocol would have to call input_mt_sync_frame().
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
