On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:54:14PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > DT nodes should use the more specific adi,adxl345 and adi,adxl346 > compatible values instead. As the ADXL346 is backward-compatible with > the ADXL345, ADXL346 nodes must list both adi,adxl346 and adi,adxl345, > in that order. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt > index 9f41d05be3be..757e42510517 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt > @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ adi,adt7475 +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C > adi,adt7476 +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C > adi,adt7490 +/-1C TDM Extended Temp Range I.C > adi,adxl345 Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer > -adi,adxl346 Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer > -adi,adxl34x Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer > +adi,adxl346 Three-Axis Digital Accelerometer (backward-compatibility value "adi,adxl345" must be listed too) I'd rather drop 346 because there is no compatible for that one anywhere. No need to resend, I can fix it here...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature