Hi, On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:35:11AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On sun[45678]i, we have one cluster of identical cores sharing a >> clock, which is ideal for using cpufreq-dt. Register a platform >> device for cpufreq-dt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > > While I don't have anything against this patch, I seem to recall that > it was not necessary anymore, or that there was some work in the > direction of removing that kind of code, have you looked into that? I believe you are referring to the work done by Viresh Kumar (CCed), specifically the 2 series "[RFC V1 0/8] CPUFreq: create platform-dev for DT based cpufreq drivers" and "[RFC] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings". So far the new code has not appeared in linux-next. If it does, I will happily use it. ChenYu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
