On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:44:01PM -0700, Benson Leung wrote:
> When using the device tree binding of compatible = "hid-over-i2c"
> the i2c id table also needs to have that name in order to
> auto load this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> index 747d544..1a7605f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> @@ -1123,6 +1123,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_hid_pm = {
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id i2c_hid_id_table[] = {
> { "hid", 0 },
> + { "hid-over-i2c", 0 },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, i2c_hid_id_table);
So we already emit this string this as a module device table (OF one),
why do we need to duplicate it in I2C? This seems like a generic problem
and not an individual driver one.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
