On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:52:51PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 06 Oct 18:30 PDT 2014, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > Hi, > > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:12:00PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > + > > > + rc = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, pwrkey->irq, > > > + NULL, pm8941_pwrkey_irq, > > > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | > > > > Do we need to hard-code IRQ flags like this? I'd rather we respect DT > > data. > > > > We could "move" it to DT but I don't think there's any other combination of > these flags would make sense. If you insist I can remove it though. No, that's fine if you are certain we want to react on both edges always. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
