> > This is a workaround. It would make sense, however, to add it because we > > want to support i2c_board_info structures. > > > > I think it really depends if an IP block can be used on non-DT platforms > (which I think is true for this trackpad) but if a driver is for an IP block > that can only be used on a DT-only platform (e.g: a PMIC that is controlled > over I2C and is only compatible with a DT-only SoC) then I don't think we need > to support the i2c_board_info structure and can get rid of the I2C ID table on > these drivers once Lee series land. That is exactly what I meant. It should be only added if there is a reason other than "workaround". If you say, it doesn't make sense on non-DT, then it should not be added.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
