Re: EVIOCSFF macro inconsistency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi ELias,

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:14:13PM +0200, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> After inspecting the <linux/input.h> header file, I found that there
> is one single ioctl value macro that is inconsistent w.r.t. the other
> macros that do an IOC_WRITE :
>     EVIOCSFF   _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, 'E', 0x80, sizeof(struct ff_effect))
> Why not define it as follows? :
>     EVIOCSFF   _IOW('E', 0x80, struct ff_effect)
> Apart from having a more readable definition, it also explicitly
> reveals type info ("struct ff_effect").

I think it is just historical.

> Is it worth to create a patch to fix it?

Sure, why not.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux