On 07/18/2014 03:35 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 18.07.2014 02:36, schrieb Chen Gang: >> >> On 07/18/2014 02:09 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Am 17.07.2014 12:48, schrieb Arnd Bergmann: >>>> AFAICT, NO_IOMEM only has a real purpose on UML these days. Could we take >>>> a shortcut here and make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML? Getting random stuff >>>> to build on UML seems pointless to me and we special-case it in a number of >>>> places already. >>> >>> If UML is the only arch without io memory the dependency on !UML seems >>> reasonable to me. :-) >>> >> >> For me, if only uml left, I suggest to implement dummy functions within >> uml instead of let CONFIG_UML appear in generic include directory. And >> then remove all HAS_IOMEM and NO_IOMEM from kernel. > > Erm, this is something completely different. > I thought we're focusing on COMPILE_TEST? > COMPILE_TEST is none-architecture specific, but UML is. So in generic include folder, if we're focusing on choosing whether COMPILE_TEST or UML, for me, I will choose COMPILE_TEST. If we're not only focusing on COMPILE_TEST, for me, if something only depend on one architecture, I'd like to put them under "arch/*/" folder. Especially, after that, we can remove all HAS_IOMEM and NO_IOMEM, nobody has to think of them again. :-) Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
