On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:08 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > I am not so much concerned about userspace, but about reusing of as > > much of existing PM framework in the drivers. Right now it is very > > hard to correctly track dependencies between general open/close, > > system suspend/resume, and various runtime-PM transitions. Adding > yet > > another PM mechanism into the mix will just add more complexity. > > Would it make sense to unbind the drivers for these devices when the > lid is closed? With the drivers gone, there would naturally be no No, because I don't want settings of my devices to disappear. You can do that only for stateless devices. And I doubt you can tell in general which devices are stateless. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
