Hi, On 04/09/2014 10:09 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:29:26PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:24:34AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> >>> Do we need all IDs? I'd expect we only interested in HID, not CIDs? >> >> I think HID handles the cases we've seen so far, but we could imagine a >> system vendor providing their own HID, a trackpad vendor's CID and then >> the generic mouse CID. It seems better to err on the side of including >> them. > > OK, fair enough. Another question - do we want to prefix IDs with "PNP:" > prefix so that if we add device tree in the future we'll know what kind > of IDs we are dealing with? I'm a bit divided on this, adding a "PNP: " prefix will make it a bit harder to parse, OTOH once we will have other users like devicetree knowing where the info comes from will be very useful. To me in the end the latter argument wins. Let me know if you agree and I'll do a v3 adding the PNP: prefix. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
