---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2014-04-01 20:20 GMT+08:00
Subject: [PATCH] Input: w90p910_ts - depend on ARCH_W90X900
To: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
抄送： Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
The w90p910_ts touchscreen driver is heavily architecture dependent,
so there is no point in letting it be built on other architectures
than it was written for.
All other W90P910/W90X900 drivers already have that dependency, so it
makes things more consistent and configuration easier.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-3.14-rc8.orig/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
2014-02-09 16:53:02.945634113 +0100
+++ linux-3.14-rc8/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig 2014-04-01
14:10:08.936933702 +0200
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_TSC2007
config TOUCHSCREEN_W90X900
tristate "W90P910 touchscreen driver"
- depends on HAVE_CLK
+ depends on ARCH_W90X900
help
Say Y here if you have a W90P910 based touchscreen.
Sure, your idea is reasonable.
Acked-by Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
Wan ZongShun.
www.mcuos.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
