On 21/03/14 03:21, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:12:08AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Which in the end turns out to be much nicer too, since it gets rid of needing
a udev-helper too. After this much too long introduction I'll let the patches
speak for themselves.
Yeah, I was coming to the conclusion that this was probably the best we
could do. It's unfortunate that "id" is already in use - we'd be able to
get away without any X server modifications otherwise.
IMO we don't need to worry about that. this is needed for a set of
devices that need a kernel patch, several synaptics patches and a server
patch to work properly anyway, so changes are already required. Approach
looks good, ACK from me.
Cheers,
Peter
Long term we probably still want to tie serio devices to the ACPI
devices in case the vendor provides power management calls there, but we
can leave that until there's an actual example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html