On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > - the first patch is mainly a way for us to reduce the work load regarding hid-mt > when device makers ask for an inclusion in the kernel. > Also, I have been notified that a Quanta 3008 was not working, and it occurs > that this particular device has a special handling in hid-mt. Of course, the > hardware maker reused the same VID/PID, but changed the protocol. > So yes, I am in favour of killing all unneeded special cases. > > I checked all the devices I was able to test, and this leaves us a bunch of > devices which, I am sure, could be removed too (all the ones following > MT_CLS_NSMU should be in this case). So, if anyone else wants to join me in > this crusade, I'd be glad to receive patches. > > - the second and third patch are the v2 of the series I sent back in December > 2013 ([PATCH 0/3] Change in handling different input device in hid-multitouch). > Henrik made valuable comments, and I did not had the time to look at it and to > figure out how to address them. Now I got a different look at this work, and > I think I addressed the issues (no more function pointers, yeah!) This is now queued for 3.15 -- so please send any followup patches / comments on top of for-3.15/multitouch. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
