Hi On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Frank Praznik <frank.praznik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > v2 of this patch set addresses the code review issues raised in v1 as well as > adding a patch that fixes the styling of multi-line comments to conform to > kernel coding standards, adds a check to protect against a potential > out-of-bounds read in the Sixaxis battery code and adds a note in hidp/core.c > that a device module now depends on the current behavior of the uniq string. Besides some minor comments, the series looks good to me: Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html