From: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@xxxxxxx>
since the irq handler always return IRQ_HANDLED, it means this irq is not
a shared IRQ at all. or at least, the SW is not self-consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
index 4d13903..4d54744 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pwrcdrv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pwrcdrv->irq,
- sirfsoc_pwrc_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
+ sirfsoc_pwrc_isr, 0,
"sirfsoc_pwrc_int", pwrcdrv);
if (error) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to claim irq %d, error: %d\n",
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
