On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:09 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 02/10/2014 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > > The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide > > the PWM API without using the generic framework. However, legacy > > PWM drivers were already moved to the generic PWM framework. > > Thus, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is not > > required anymore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Lars-Peter Clausen, I really appreciate your Acked-by. However, the same patch was already submitted by Sascha Hauer.[1] So, please ignore this patch. Thank you. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/16/262 Best regards, Jingoo Han > > > --- > > drivers/input/misc/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig > > index ae74df7..762e6d2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig > > @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ config INPUT_PCF8574 > > > > config INPUT_PWM_BEEPER > > tristate "PWM beeper support" > > - depends on PWM && HAVE_PWM > > + depends on PWM > > help > > Say Y here to get support for PWM based beeper devices. > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
