Hi,
On 01/02/2014 12:59 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Hans, Dmitry,
Am Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2014, 10:37:47 schrieb Hans de Goede:
Hi,
On 01/01/2014 09:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys"
+ - reg: mmio address range of the chip
+ - interrupts: interrupt to which the chip is connected
+ - allwinner,chan0-step: step in mV between keys must be 150 or 200
+ - allwinner,chan0-keycodes: array of include/uapi/linux/input.h KEY_
codes>
I think this should be "linux,chan0-keycodes".
Right, because the codes are Linux specific, will fix in v2.
but the property with its "chan0-" thingy would be allwinner-specific if I'm
not mistaken.
Correct, but denoting that this is linux only is more important, so as to
avoid namespace collisions.
Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not re-use
a button binding similar to gpio-keys like:
lradc: lradc@01c22800 {
compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys";
reg = <0x01c22800 0x100>;
interrupts = <31>;
allwinner,chan0-step = <200>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
button@0 {
reg = <0>; /* your channel index from above */
linux,code = <115>; /* already used as dt-property */
};
button@1 {
reg = <1>;
linux,code = <114>;
};
Ugh no. Having a vendor specific property which is KISS certainly beats this,
both wrt ease of writing dts files as well as wrt the dts parsing code in the driver.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
