On Sunday 17 November 2013 12:38:43 simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > So it is a bad choice to use hid_output_raw_report (which calls > > usb_control_msg) in a ff_memless control function. I will just send a > > revert > > patch in some minutes. > > Rather than revert, can't we just replace the raw call with > 'hid_hw_request()' to send the data? This device doesn't have any report and I had not the time to check how to correctly generate the fields manually for the report/check why it doesn't have any. Kind regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
