Hello Dmitry, On 11.11.2013 08:31, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:26:51PM +0100, Florian Echtler wrote: >> + >> + /* max value unknown, but major/minor axis >> + * can never be larger than screen */ >> + input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, >> + 0, SENSOR_RES_X, 0, 0); >> + input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MINOR, >> + 0, SENSOR_RES_Y, 0, 0); > > If the range is unknown do we really want to specify min/max? Geometrically speaking, these _are_ the min/max values. I can't say for sure if the device has a cutoff threshold somewhere, but in terms of geometric interpretation, I'd say this is correct. > Also, does the patch below mess up or device or it still works? I'll test this tomorrow (no access to SUR40 today). If everything works, should I resubmit my patch with yours included or just tell you that it's fine? BR, Florian -- SENT FROM MY DEC VT50 TERMINAL
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
