Hi Dmitry On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>Given the recent ABS_*-regression, I wrote a bunch of more aggressive >>stress-tests for this. I didn't found any regressions if EVIOCREVOKE is >>not >>used, but one with revoke on an empty queue in evdev_read(). Now fixed. >>Please >>let me know what your plans for this patch are (-next or -rc1?) so we >>can >>schedule accordingly. > > I think this one is safer than extending axis numbers as there is no concerns about breaking stuff - it's brand new. So I think we can work it in -rc1. Sounds good, thanks. The ABS-fixes will take some time, yepp. We can retry these with the guitar/drums ABS bits for 3.13. EVIOC[SG]ABS2 is probably the way to go. >> As a side note, will you attend LPC this year? We >>have a >>bunch of fancy stuff I'd like your opinion on (including >>device-properties, device-detection, ABS_* bit extension). > > Yes. I'll get to new Orleans a couple days earlier (Sunday night) so if you are in town we could meet for drinks or such. I'll arrive there on Saturday-evening, will drop you a message. See you in New Orleans. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
