* Zubair Lutfullah | 2013-08-13 21:05:03 [+0100]:
>diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>index 3ceac3e..0d7e313 100644
>--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>@@ -141,58 +350,51 @@ static int tiadc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> {
…
>+ if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
>+ return -EBUSY;
>+ else {
You can drop else so you lose one ident level.
>+ unsigned long timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies
>+ (IDLE_TIMEOUT * adc_dev->channels);
What computing this once? ->channels is assigned at probe time.
>+ step_en = get_adc_step_mask(adc_dev);
>+ am335x_tsc_se_set(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc, step_en);
>+
>+ /* Wait for ADC sequencer to complete sampling */
>+ while (tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_ADCFSM) & SEQ_STATUS) {
>+ if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
>+ return -EAGAIN;
You should check the condition after the timeout occured once again. It
is possible that the task performing the read has been pushed away by a
higher prio task (or preempted incase this sounds like a bully) and
after it got back on the cpu the timeout occured but the condition is
valid and no reason for -EAGAIN.
>+ }
and the bracket needs to left by one tab.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
