On 05/22/2013 10:08 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The DT support added in ("iio: adc: am335x: Add DT support") > added an else case which shifts the code to the righ for no reaseon. > This patch simply removes the pointless else case and shifts the code > back to the left. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Either I am going completely mad or I never took the original patch. I'm not entirely sure I can remember why though. I think there were issues with another patch in the series and so I was waiting for a reposting that never happened. Looking back I think the debate was curriously enough whether it made sense ot have the platform_data support in there or not. Did anyone every take any of that series? Which tree did you base these on? > --- > drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 13 +++++-------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c > index f258eb0..ac78672 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c > @@ -214,14 +214,11 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "adc"); > if (!node) > return -EINVAL; > - else { > - err = of_property_read_u32(node, > - "ti,adc-channels", &val32); > - if (err < 0) > - goto err_free_device; > - else > - adc_dev->channels = val32; > - } > + err = of_property_read_u32(node, > + "ti,adc-channels", &val32); > + if (err < 0) > + goto err_free_device; > + adc_dev->channels = val32; > } > > indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html