On 05/03/2013 11:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:28:25PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> On Fri, 3 May 2013, majianpeng wrote: >> >>>>> Jiri, we had a similar bug in the RH bugzilla: >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958935 >>>>> >>>>> Are these two reports potentially fixed by your patch "HID: protect >>>>> hid_debug_list" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2453931/) >>>>> If so, maybe we should send it to stable as well... >>>> I actually believe this bug is *introduced* by that patch :) All the >>>> reports were with the kernel containing it, right? >>>> >>>> Does the patch below fix it, please? >> [ ... snip ... ] >>> Add your patch.Found the following message: >>> [ 150.908051] ====================================================== >>> [ 150.908053] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] >>> [ 150.908056] 3.9.0+ #102 Not tainted >> Right, oh well, I missed that scenario. > This looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > It's all good for me. Thanks! Jianpeng Ma -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
